<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Experiment concluded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524</link>
	<description>Photography and random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:22:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524&#038;cpage=1#comment-20677</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524#comment-20677</guid>
		<description>;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark giles</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524&#038;cpage=1#comment-20478</link>
		<dc:creator>mark giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524#comment-20478</guid>
		<description>So moments later I find the photo of your Boxster (flickr)--you learn fast. Just what I was looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So moments later I find the photo of your Boxster (flickr)&#8211;you learn fast. Just what I was looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark giles</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524&#038;cpage=1#comment-20477</link>
		<dc:creator>mark giles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 11:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524#comment-20477</guid>
		<description>Pentax has gotten back to the full frame arena in the digital world: the 645.

Oh. . . the price.

I would add my 2 centavos to yr. take on Canon--the lens line-up really is stellar. And I&#039;ve never heard much about the Canon IQ (in RAW) being anything less than competent.

Visited your photo sites. You have a good eye, fine sense of color in particular. In your category of wheeled machines, take that eye in closer; get bits of things that tickle our memories. Seeing a whole Mini, even on a beach, is too much like an advert--that&#039;s ground that has been covered. How about it&#039;s tire track, with just a hint of black rubber.  Or a reflection in a tidal pool,: a car, bicycle, roller skate. Abstract shapes to the eye, resolved into the subject by the brain. Wing it, be free form. (Here I am giving someone else advice!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pentax has gotten back to the full frame arena in the digital world: the 645.</p>
<p>Oh. . . the price.</p>
<p>I would add my 2 centavos to yr. take on Canon&#8211;the lens line-up really is stellar. And I&#8217;ve never heard much about the Canon IQ (in RAW) being anything less than competent.</p>
<p>Visited your photo sites. You have a good eye, fine sense of color in particular. In your category of wheeled machines, take that eye in closer; get bits of things that tickle our memories. Seeing a whole Mini, even on a beach, is too much like an advert&#8211;that&#8217;s ground that has been covered. How about it&#8217;s tire track, with just a hint of black rubber.  Or a reflection in a tidal pool,: a car, bicycle, roller skate. Abstract shapes to the eye, resolved into the subject by the brain. Wing it, be free form. (Here I am giving someone else advice!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524&#038;cpage=1#comment-4395</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524#comment-4395</guid>
		<description>Fred-
The K-x is a great camera and Pentax makes some great glass. From my experience shooting the Pentax K10D, Canon 5D and now the 30D one can get equal results from all 3 when shooting RAW. My reasoning behind returning to Canon is my desire to get back to a full frame sensor body and Pentax has shown no interest in creating a full frame body. It&#039;s just a personal preference :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred-<br />
The K-x is a great camera and Pentax makes some great glass. From my experience shooting the Pentax K10D, Canon 5D and now the 30D one can get equal results from all 3 when shooting RAW. My reasoning behind returning to Canon is my desire to get back to a full frame sensor body and Pentax has shown no interest in creating a full frame body. It&#8217;s just a personal preference :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524&#038;cpage=1#comment-4326</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robertsdonovan.com/?p=1524#comment-4326</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my sequence of events:

- Enjoyed photography
- Moved through the usual (many) film and digital cameras (I was born in 1970)
- Chose Pentax for DSLR (K100D)
- Saw K100D vs 5D test and was shocked at how the Canon muddied everything. NO texture or bite.
- Bought K-x.
- Wanted to buy FA31, and did so (your review was helpful, thanks)
- Left K-x and FA31 in a cab in Hong Kong
- Bought WHITE K-x so as not to lose so easily in dark taxis
- Have lenses from 8mm to 300mm (APS-C)
- Wonder why you would go to a 30D when a cheapo K-x murders it every which way but VF. And VF isn&#039;t a plus if the results are washed-out details in the name of lack of noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my sequence of events:</p>
<p>- Enjoyed photography<br />
- Moved through the usual (many) film and digital cameras (I was born in 1970)<br />
- Chose Pentax for DSLR (K100D)<br />
- Saw K100D vs 5D test and was shocked at how the Canon muddied everything. NO texture or bite.<br />
- Bought K-x.<br />
- Wanted to buy FA31, and did so (your review was helpful, thanks)<br />
- Left K-x and FA31 in a cab in Hong Kong<br />
- Bought WHITE K-x so as not to lose so easily in dark taxis<br />
- Have lenses from 8mm to 300mm (APS-C)<br />
- Wonder why you would go to a 30D when a cheapo K-x murders it every which way but VF. And VF isn&#8217;t a plus if the results are washed-out details in the name of lack of noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
